8 February, 2012











Forum
Manufacturers
Register
Login
Hey You! Registering only takes 5 seconds... literally! Look at the sign up form!
Latest Forum Posts
My store is now a Gret...
Posted in 35 minutes ago
A Custom Zildjians vs ...
Posted in 38 minutes ago
new kit.....
Posted in 42 minutes ago
Road to 100k
Posted in 48 minutes ago
PDP X7 - All Maple- b...
Posted in 6 hours ago
Sponsor Links
Online Users
There are 18 guests browsing this site
Newest Members
Please welcome our newest members:

domvan118
Registered 2 days ago
pallasathena
Registered 5 days ago
ADRIAN77
Registered 5 days ago
ADRNGZA
Registered 5 days ago
pive77
Registered 7 days ago
Register as a Member
Registering as a member is super easy and takes 5 seconds! Join in the discussion today.
 
Page: << 1 2 3  Forum Home - Bugs - Mozilla
Mozilla
Large Bronze Star
Tim



689 posts (0 today)
0 Awards

[QUOTE=ifsemail]

I never said there was anything "Wrong" with Mozilla, I'm just stating that as a network manager, I've seen issues with that and Netscape on my network, whereas, IE has given us far fewer issues. Granted, M$ has it's problems, they all do. But, based on my too many years in networking, IE simply works better than the others. Hence, the reason that thus far the world uses IE.

Tim is correct, in my humble opinon, as stated above.

[/QUOTE]

Very well put.  Thank you for backing me up with your expertise.

[QUOTE=thestub]Try, it loads slower - but once it is up and running it renders pages far faster than IE. And it has little features that IE needs to have.

In this, as in all things, it is a choice not a compromise. I just can't get on with IE (and I was an IE user until Mozilla 1.4 was released!).

I actually like the fact that Mozilla correctly (yes correctly - it may not look like the author inteded, but it is what he asked for) renders badly written sites - if all the browsers did then people would be forced to write correct code! That is the engineer in me - if you are going to do it, do it right.

Lots of the little niggles with Mozilla are fixed in the development build (FireFox, ne FireBird) - that loads fast, renders pages EXCEPTIONALLY quickly, and has all the nice extra features of full Mozilla!

As I said, it is a choice, not a compromise - like choosing Tama over Pearl![/QUOTE]

It is this very reason that makes Internet Explorer's most current version and a few prior far superior to anything and everything else.

Tim38106.2216319444
Large Gold Star
thestub



6,878 posts (1 today)
7 Awards

To be honest, I tend to include Mozilla and Open Office as standard on any network I 'administer'. The biggest problem we have with the larger networks (600+ computers) is finding where the cache and cookies end up (sorted it now ).

The freeware e-mail, calender and RSS clients for Mozilla turn it into a truly useful tool - for far less than Office (which I would need for the same level of suport in Outlook). The fact that it is also the best web browser is just useful .

In your network, do you maintain a common drive backup - we got it down to a fine art, and can now reformat the entire network in about 2 hours!
Gareth

I'm from the Old South Wales. Original and the best.
Large Bronze Star
Tim



689 posts (0 today)
0 Awards

Who dictates what the best is?
Large Gold Star
thestub



6,878 posts (1 today)
7 Awards

You do yourself. I love arguing about things like software - it is like music; you can't be wrong - and the other guy always is

This is probably the most entertaining thread I have posted on any forum in a while! Keep it coming - I love it, I really do!

But honestly, if you haven't checked out FireFox then do - it is a worthwhile thing to try. And if you don't like it, bin it (it doesn't even need to be installed ).

Shall I start another thread about Open Office, or even Linux?
Gareth

I'm from the Old South Wales. Original and the best.
Large Bronze Star
ifsemail



709 posts (0 today)
0 Awards

We (Our IT group) have 17 servers, running all the OS's out there for one program or another, and have close to 2000 pc's on the network now. I can't even count the routers and switches any more. MY network section spans California...OUR network spans the globe with 20+ countries. The group just in the USA involves over 20 IT guys and is from the left side to the right side and from top to bottom. We've a pretty nice network. A "TRUE" WAN system. 90% of it is all Token ring topology.

Our back-up is a constant stratagy, our catastrophic recovery would be days.

Large Gold Star
thestub



6,878 posts (1 today)
7 Awards

Do you find any issues with the token ring systems now? they seem to have falled out of favour in recent time - I noticed that IBM have stopped supporting them recently.

I now that token ring is the better technology - it just seems to me that getting the hardware is harder and harder. Is the technology starting to lag behind other systems in terms of speeds?

Also, how is it to administer across WAN links (never had to worry about anything other than internet gateways!)? I would assume with such a large topology you are really administering several smaller networks, seperated by routers.

Also, 17 seems a small number of servers for the number of machines. Are the network users not heavy users of network files stores? Do find that there are any issues with server requests - there is a potential 200 people per server .

You're sorry you mentioned it now - I am a true geek, and love to learn about this stuff!

Don't suppose you need to buy a network ISO managment system? Worth a try I suppose
Gareth

I'm from the Old South Wales. Original and the best.
Page: << 1 2 3 

To post a reply, you need to login or register.



Drum-World.com Copyright © 2002 onwards. All rights reserved.