|
Online Users
|
|
There are 20 guests browsing this site
|
|
|
Newest Members
|
|
Please welcome our newest members:
domvan118 Registered 2 days ago pallasathena Registered 5 days ago ADRIAN77 Registered 5 days ago ADRNGZA Registered 5 days ago pive77 Registered 7 days ago
|
|
|
|
| Mozilla | | |
|
|  thestub
 6,878 posts (1 today) 7 Awards
28 April 2004
| Never had any problems with Mozilla - try it is based on the Netscape codebase, but it is far sweeter than any of the Netscape releases.
As for cookies, what is wrong with them? If you mean tracking cookies, then I am all with you - but as a network programmer, cookies are an efficent and subtle method for keeping sessions alive and other nice things. Hell - I bet this site drops at least one, I have never had to log in since I signed up!
Mozilla is, in my opinion, the best browser in the game at the moment. It is fast (once it has loaded ) 100% W3C standards compliant - if it don't work in Mozilla then it is wrong - and the extra features that come as standard should be in all browsers (pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, cookie tracing, Java/JavaScript debugging).
Just try it - it has evolved since the bad old days of Netscape! And best of all - it isn't Micro$oft! Gareth
I'm from the Old South Wales. Original and the best. | | Message posted 2842 days ago | IP Logged |
| |
|  Tim
689 posts (0 today) 0 Awards
28 April 2004
| Um....it's the other way around according to geek friends of mine around the internet. Netscape is based off Mozilla. And both take too much time to open up, and both have slow code.
I do, and I will always prefer Microsoft Internet Explorer. I have had absolutely no problems with it. I have never seen any website NOT get rendered properly using IE, like I have with Netscape and Mozilla. I hate Mozilla. It's just too slow, and doesn't render every web page perfectly. Even the ones that have out of date code like this page.
IE is superior. I don't need "tabbed browsing". I am very fast and efficient at web browsing.
I used Mozilla. I found it to be far inferior to IE. It was slow, it rendered a few pages incorrectly which I regularly visit, and it takes too long to open up. If Mozilla were just as fast as IE when it opens, and if it rendered even the "incorrectly coded" pages correctly AS INTERNET EXPLORER DOES, then I'd find Mozilla to be far superior.
But for now, I'll stick with IE.
It's kind of ironic. Back in 1997 or so when I made the switch from Macintosh to IBM (any Windows machine), I used to think Netscape was the best out there. Then I tried Internet Explorer. The first thing I noticed was that it ran faster. It took about 1/16th the time to open up, and it was just cleaner. I used to scoff and laugh at people who used IE, but now I myself find that IE is superior and now I know why people prefer IE over Mozilla, of any kind.
Oh, and if you want to see proof that Netscape is based off Mozilla, just look in your registry, or surf around inside the program itself. You'll see a few mentions of "Mozilla", even though you do not have Mozilla on your machine, although you do if you have Netscape. Tim38105.4493865741 | | Message posted 2842 days ago | IP Logged |
| |
|  ifsemail
709 posts (0 today) 0 Awards
28 April 2004
| I never said there was anything "Wrong" with Mozilla, I'm just stating that as a network manager, I've seen issues with that and Netscape on my network, whereas, IE has given us far fewer issues. Granted, M$ has it's problems, they all do. But, based on my too many years in networking, IE simply works better than the others. Hence, the reason that thus far the world uses IE.
Tim is correct, in my humble opinon, as stated above. | | Message posted 2842 days ago | IP Logged |
| |
|  thestub
 6,878 posts (1 today) 7 Awards
28 April 2004
| Try, it loads slower - but once it is up and running it renders pages far faster than IE. And it has little features that IE needs to have.
In this, as in all things, it is a choice not a compromise. I just can't get on with IE (and I was an IE user until Mozilla 1.4 was released!).
I actually like the fact that Mozilla correctly (yes correctly - it may not look like the author inteded, but it is what he asked for) renders badly written sites - if all the browsers did then people would be forced to write correct code! That is the engineer in me - if you are going to do it, do it right.
Lots of the little niggles with Mozilla are fixed in the development build (FireFox, ne FireBird) - that loads fast, renders pages EXCEPTIONALLY quickly, and has all the nice extra features of full Mozilla!
As I said, it is a choice, not a compromise - like choosing Tama over Pearl! Gareth
I'm from the Old South Wales. Original and the best. | | Message posted 2842 days ago | IP Logged |
| |
| | |  playinpearls
 6,613 posts (2 today) 1 Awards
28 April 2004
| JAVA!!! coffee? playinpearls38105.7241898148 -~=Joey=~- Aclarion!
has no website...lame!
www.myspace.com/livingston search me on facebook! | | Message posted 2842 days ago | IP Logged |
| |
|  ifsemail
709 posts (0 today) 0 Awards
28 April 2004
| Ahhh...I hate Java !! Glad I just manage a network, not write the software the runs on it.
Stub, you're right in that it's a choice. At this time, I just prefer IE.
HOWEVER !!!....I would NEVER choose Tama over Pearl !! (Huh Joey !!) | | Message posted 2842 days ago | IP Logged |
| |
| |
|

To post a reply, you need to login or register.
|